Microwave Ovens!!!

by Kevin C. on Sep 8, 2009

One of the most revolutionary kitchen tools we have today was accidentally discovered and then invented in the 1940s and ’50s. The microwave oven, whose origins has nothing to do with cooking, dates back to World War II. According to IdeaFinder.com:

During World War II, two scientists invented the magnetron, a tube that produces microwaves. Installing magnetrons in Britain’s radar system, the microwaves were able to spot Nazi warplanes on their way to bomb the British Isles…. The idea of using microwave energy to cook food was accidentally discovered by Percy LeBaron Spencer of the Raytheon Company when he found that radar waves had melted a candy bar in his pocket. Experiments showed that microwave heating could raise the internal temperature of many foods far more rapidly than a conventional oven.

So, what exactly is a microwave, and are microwave ovens safe? We’ll need to consider the electromagnetic spectrum, something you’ve probably seen in your high school physics and chemistry classes.

The Electromagnetic Spectrum

The Electromagnetic Spectrum

Put simply, a “micro”-wave is a “small” wave that is on the order of 1 centimeter, not on the order of 1 micrometer, as the name would suggest. That is, these waves have wavelengths of about 1 centimeter. (A centimeter, or cm, is 1E-2 m.) When we compare this with visible light, which is on the order between 1E-6 and 1E-7, we see that microwaves are longer than visible light. If we remember that speed of light = (frequency of the wave)*(wavelength of the wave), where the speed of light is about 2.9979E8 m/s, then we can see that frequency is inversely proportional to the wavelength. What this means is microwaves travel at a lower frequency than visible light. (Frequency is measured in cycles per second, or Hertz.)

Again, from IdeaFinder.com:

[Microwaves] are found in the non-ionizing portion of the energy spectrum, between radio waves and visible light. “Non-ionizing” means that microwaves do not detach charged particles and produce atoms with an unbalanced plus or minus charge. Microwaves can therefore safely produce heat and not cause food to become radioactive.

Now, let’s take a look at a few practical things about microwave ovens, like why radiation doesn’t escape into the kitchen, or is it safe to stop the microwave and reach in to grab the piping hot HotPocket about eat it right away? If you notice that there is a metal mesh screen in the door of the microwave. The side of the holes, on the order of half a centimeter or so, allows the physically smaller visible light waves to pass through but prevents the “larger” microwaves from leaving the microwave oven (remember that light waves are orders of magnitude smaller than microwaves). Also, you don’t need to worry about residual microwave radiation from the microwave oven because these waves always travel at the speed of light and will have been absorbed into your food long before it gets a chance to escape and hit you in the face.

More information on the history of the microwave oven can be found at Gallawa.com. Image from ScienceProg.

Twitter Weekly Digest for 2009-09-04

by Twitter on Sep 4, 2009

Powered by Twitter Tools.

Monte Carlo Simulation: What Is It?

by Hans F. on Sep 3, 2009

Sometimes engineers and scientists are faced with a problem that is not easily solvable with an algorithm that leads to a definite answer. Perhaps the problem is very complex and has many components to it, or the inputs to the problem are not constant and could vary. When faced with a situation like this, Monte Carlo simulation is the way to go.

The basic gist of how Monte Carlo simulations work is that you randomly select inputs, perform calculations on the randomly-selected inputs, and collect the outputs. This process is repeated several times (perhaps thousands, tens of thousands, or even more! As with any statistical sample, the more, the better), and in the end, all the outputs are gathered together and analyzed. To randomly select inputs, you’ll need to specify boundaries for which inputs can be selected from. A statistical model can help with this, such as a Gaussian distribution, which is a fancy term for the familiar “bell curve.” As for the aggregated outputs, statistical analysis would make sense in order to make sense of thousands of data sets. Basically, statistics is a useful tool that compliments the Monte Carlo technique. Also, generally computers are used to perform a Monte Carlo simulation due to the large number of repetitive calculations required.

This is what a bell curve looks like.

This is what a bell curve looks like.

Monte Carlo simulations can be used in space sciences. For example, if one wants to analyze the risk of failure of a spacecraft in orbit, one can perform a Monte Carlo simulation with random inputs for how the spacecraft begins its orbit (speed, physical orientation, etc.), since that state cannot be predetermined accurately and instead can be modeled statistically. Then, the laws of orbital mechanics can be applied to the inputs to produce outputs that can be analyzed later. A more simple example of where the Monte Carlo method is used is the classic game of Battleship. Initially, a player would randomly guess locations for where a battleship is located. After the player scores a hit, the player would follow an algorithm (guess points that are in line with the hit) to sink the battleship (the outcome).

(Image from Wikipedia)

“Earth Engineering”

by Kevin C. on Sep 1, 2009

A BBC article today, “Engineering Earth ‘is feasible’,” highlights the possibility of successfully mitigating further climate change by removing carbon dioxide (the primary greenhouse gas) or by preventing the Sun’s rays from even reaching Earth. A UK Royal Society study finds that these tactics are “technically possible,” even though they may be practically infeasible.

The study stressed that engineering approaches would only have a limited impact, and that efforts should continue to be focused on reducing CO2 emissions.

“(Governments) should make increased efforts toward mitigating and adapting to climate change and in particular agreeing to global emissions reductions of at least 50% on 1990 levels by 2050 and more thereafter,” the authors wrote.

But, they continued, there should be “further research and development” into geo-engineering options “to investigate whether low-risk methods can be made available if it becomes necessary to reduce the rate of warming this century”.

Injecting sea salt into the clouds could cool the planetOf the two basic geo-engineering approaches, the report concluded that those involving the removal of carbon dioxide were preferable, as they effectively return the climate system closer to its pre-industrial state.

But the authors found that many of these options were currently too expensive to implement widely.

This included “carbon capture and storage” methods, which require CO2 be captured directly from power plants and stored under the Earth’s surface.
Current proposed methods also work very slowly, taking many decades to remove enough carbon dioxide to significantly reduce the rate of temperature rise.

Of the carbon removal techniques assessed, three were considered to have most potential:
1. CO2 capture from ambient air: This would be the preferred method, as it effectively reverses the cause of climate change.
2. Enhanced weathering: This aims to enhance natural reactions of CO2 from the air with rocks and minerals. It was identified as a prospective longer-term option.
3. Land use and afforestation: The report found that land-use management could and should play a small but significant role in reducing the growth of atmospheric CO2 concentrations.

Read more about it here.

Twitter Weekly Digest for 2009-08-28

by Twitter on Aug 28, 2009
  • In our future: BENDY DISPLAYS! What do you think this means for our living room? Or even Times Square?!? http://bit.ly/105N5q #
  • Ever hear the line, "We've been walking around in circles"? There's good news. Now you can blame science: http://bit.ly/aWZl3 #
  • Remember the scare with the Hadron Collider and black holes? Apparently, we just can't get enough of them (Black Holes!) http://bit.ly/PFqjA #
  • First Internet addict rehab center opens in America! Check it: http://bit.ly/NaXbs. Reminds me of this from The Onion: http://bit.ly/15sjIS #
  • Back to school season isn't fun… #
  • Apparently the best way to decrease disease is to build better toildets. But at $1 a month to use the facilities? http://bit.ly/3X3yNU #
  • Got in a political discussion with a few people and missed the 9:00 am deadline. Sorry! :-( #
  • Testing TweetDeck span. #
  • Testing TweetDeck spanning. #
  • Testing a second post. Today is the first day of class. #
  • Nuclear Engineering class is pretty fun already! #

Powered by Twitter Tools.