<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Engineerography Blog &#187; Friction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://engineerography.com/tag/friction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://engineerography.com</link>
	<description>Studying and writing about everyday engineering, since 2009.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 15:26:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How Does ABS Work? It&#8217;s the Static Friction</title>
		<link>http://engineerography.com/2009/07/how-the-abs-works-its-the-static-and-kinetic-friction/</link>
		<comments>http://engineerography.com/2009/07/how-the-abs-works-its-the-static-and-kinetic-friction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin C.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In-Depth Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kinetic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Static]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engineerography.com/?p=672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You drivers out there have probably heard of the ABS in your car (at least, if you are driving a car, you had better know about it!). ABS stands for &#8220;Anti-lock Braking System,&#8221; which should never be written as the &#8220;ABS system.&#8221; This is not a post about how ABS works, but rather one about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_692" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 240px"><a href="http://engineerography.com/files/2009/07/s_skid.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-692" title="Car Skidding" src="http://engineerography.com/files/2009/07/s_skid.jpg" alt="Car Skidding" width="230" height="322" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Car Skidding</p></div>
<p>You drivers out there have probably heard of the ABS in your car (at least, if you <em>are</em> driving a car, you had better know about it!). ABS stands for &#8220;Anti-lock Braking System,&#8221; which should never be written as the &#8220;ABS system.&#8221; This is not a post about how ABS works, but rather one about the underlying concept behind it.</p>
<p>Generally what ABS does is to prevent wheels from locking up. To understand this, consider what would conventionally occur (i.e. in a vehicle without ABS). If someone were to slam on the brakes in a moving car without ABS, the braking discs or drums would cause the wheel to stop turning. Typically, that is the whole purpose of brakes in the first place, but usually one would gradually brake the car to stop by applying more and more brake pressure until the vehicle stops. If the brakes lock up the wheels suddenly (which is unhealthy for the brakes anyway), wheels lock up. Remember that the car is still traveling at considerable speed. Simply preventing the wheels from turning does not stop a car. The momentum of the car keeps the vehicle moving forward, so we get tire skidding, and we lose traction. That&#8217;s a bad thing; we would be sliding and have little to no control of steering.</p>
<p>Fundamentally, ABS adds some electronics (like computers and sensors) in between the brake pedal and brakes and modulates the braking pressure so that tires don&#8217;t skid and traction is maintained. We&#8217;re going to focus on why it&#8217;s so important not to skid by taking a look a friction. If you want to learn about how ABS actually works, you can visit HowStuffWorks&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://auto.howstuffworks.com/auto-parts/brakes/brake-types/anti-lock-brake1.htm">How Anti-Lock Brakes Work</a>&#8220; article or About.com&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://autorepair.about.com/od/glossary/a/def_ABS.htm">How Does ABS Work</a>&#8221; article.</p>
<p>There are two basic types of kinematic friction: static and kinetic, but both are a function of the normal force. (Do you remember what the normal force is? &#8220;<a href="http://engineerography.com/2009/07/friction-at-the-tip-of-the-finger/">Friction at the Tip of the Finger</a>&#8221; talked a little about it a few weeks ago.) The friction force can be loosely described by this relation:</p>
<div id="attachment_691" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 276px"><a href="http://engineerography.com/files/2009/07/frictionforce.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-691" title="Friction Force" src="http://engineerography.com/files/2009/07/frictionforce.png" alt="Friction Force" width="266" height="25" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Friction Force</p></div>
<p><strong>Coefficient of Friction</strong></p>
<p>If you recall from &#8220;<a href="http://engineerography.com/2009/07/friction-at-the-tip-of-the-finger/">Friction at the Tip of the Finger</a>&#8220;:</p>
<blockquote><p>The coefficient of friction is a dimensionless constant that takes into account the two surfaces. The higher this coefficient, the greater the friction force. Using everyday experience, for example, the coefficient of friction between leather shoes on ice is much smaller than between sneakers on the concrete sidewalk. (There are tables we can use to looks these coefficients if we really wanted to. And it’s important to note that these coefficients are generally higher at higher temperatures for the same pair of surfaces.)</p></blockquote>
<p>Note: the coefficient of friction is basically depends on the two types of materials in use, and static coefficient of friction is usually greater than the kinetic coefficient of friction. We&#8217;ll see this in a bit.</p>
<p><strong>Kinetic Friction</strong></p>
<div id="attachment_693" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://engineerography.com/files/2009/07/diagram.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-693 " title="Sliding Dictionary Example" src="http://engineerography.com/files/2009/07/diagram.png" alt="Sliding Dictionary Example" width="300" height="234" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Sliding Dictionary Example</p></div>
<p>Let&#8217;s take a look at these two cases. Kinetic friction (or sliding friction) is simple. It only comes into play when something is physically rubbing against something else. It is the resistive force that goes in the opposite direction of motion. So, imagine you are successfully pushing a heavy dictionary across your desk. You can clearly feel the resistance, which you&#8217;d usually attribute to its relatively heavy weight. In fact, what you are feeling is the kinetic friction that resists the motion (remember, it has to be moving for the concept of kinetic friction to apply). This friction force is a function of the normal force, which, in turn, varies directly with the object&#8217;s weight. So, it is generally correct to assume that heavier objects are harder to push (assuming the same coefficient of friction, of course). Does that make sense?</p>
<div id="attachment_690" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 357px"><a href="http://engineerography.com/files/2009/07/frictionforcekinetic.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-690 " title="Kinetic Friction Force" src="http://engineerography.com/files/2009/07/frictionforcekinetic.png" alt="Kinetic Friction Force" width="347" height="25" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Kinetic Friction Force</p></div>
<p><strong>Static Friction</strong></p>
<p>Static friction is pretty awesome, but it takes some explaining. Firstly, this friction is present whenever there is no motion (or static). The magnitude (or value) of this force, however, depends on what is acting on it. This can go from 0 to a maximum value that is dictated by the friction formula above. So, for the case of static friction, we have:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://engineerography.com/files/2009/07/static1.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-689    aligncenter" src="http://engineerography.com/files/2009/07/static1.png" alt="Static Friction Force" width="670" height="65" /></a></p>
<div id="attachment_688" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 344px"><a href="http://engineerography.com/files/2009/07/static2.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-688" title="Static Friction Force" src="http://engineerography.com/files/2009/07/static2.png" alt="" width="334" height="25" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Static Friction Force</p></div>
<p>Let&#8217;s go back to our dictionary example. Once the pushing force exceeds the maximum static friction force, the book begins to slide, and we move into the kinetic friction regime. But before that point, it takes some increasing amount of force to get the dictionary to slide. The magnitude of the static friction force is only to the extent that it is needed. Consider the following series of diagrams. (Remember that the Newton is the metric unit for force.) Let&#8217;s assume for sake of example, that the maximum static friction force is 10 N. Note that the kinetic coefficient of friction is less than the static one, which we see because the kinetic friction force is less than the maximum static friction force.</p>
<p>Now, how does it apply to ABS and car tires? Keep in mind that as a car tire rolls, there is a patch of rubber that is actually stationary and static friction is in effect. We want to maintain this static friction for as long as possible (for grip, traction, and control). If the rubber starts to slide across the asphalt (when the wheel locks up), we lose the benefit of the static friction force and the stopping force exerted by the tires on the car. That&#8217;ll be a bad thing, especially since we usually slam on the brakes when we really, really need to stop (to avoid hitting the ducks crossing the road, let&#8217;s say). In order to stop in the shortest time possible, we prefer the greater static force over the kinetic force. In this case, our first instinct of abruptly pressing on the brakes fails us. Thank goodness for ABS. (Or, we can all just pay more attention to the road!)</p>
<p>Car image from: <a href="http://www.aa1car.com/library/stability_control.htm">http://www.aa1car.com/library/stability_control.htm</a></p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friction#Static_friction">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friction#Static_friction</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://engineerography.com/2009/07/how-the-abs-works-its-the-static-and-kinetic-friction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friction at the Tip of the Finger</title>
		<link>http://engineerography.com/2009/07/friction-at-the-tip-of-the-finger/</link>
		<comments>http://engineerography.com/2009/07/friction-at-the-tip-of-the-finger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin C.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fingers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engineerography.com/?p=551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier last month, the Journal of Experimental Biology published a study about fingerprints and that there is new doubt that fingerprints increase friction, which supposedly facilitates the grip by our hands. Now, they are saying that fingerprints actually reduce the amount of friction between the skin and other surfaces. This is probably contrary to everyone&#8217;s intuition. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier last month, the Journal of Experimental Biology published a study about fingerprints and that there is new doubt that fingerprints increase friction, which supposedly facilitates the grip by our hands. Now, they are saying that fingerprints actually reduce the amount of friction between the skin and other surfaces. This is probably contrary to everyone&#8217;s intuition.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8093134.stm">BBC News</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Dr Roland Ennos [from the University of Manchester in England] designed a machine which enabled him to measure the amount of friction generated by a fingerprint when it was in contact with the acrylic glass.</p>
<p>The machine was then strapped to the index finger of one of his students.</p>
<p>Dr Ennos expected the amount of friction to increase in proportion to the strength at which the acrylic glass was pushed against the finger.</p>
<p>This would have supported the theory that the fingerprint was helping to improve grip by ramping up friction levels.</p>
<p>However, the results showed that friction levels increased by a much smaller amount than had been anticipated.</p></blockquote>
<p>Let&#8217;s take a close look at this. Firstly, what is friction and how does it work? Friction can be described as a force that resists movement between two objects that are touching. For a &#8220;normal&#8221; solid, friction is calculated by multiplying a constant called the coefficient of friction by the amount of force that’s being applied to keep the two surfaces touching. The coefficient of friction is a dimensionless constant that takes into account the two surfaces. The higher this coefficient, the greater the friction force. Using everyday experience, for example, the coefficient of friction between leather shoes on ice is much smaller than between sneakers on the concrete sidewalk. (There are tables we can use to looks these coefficients if we really wanted to. And it&#8217;s important to note that these coefficients are generally higher at higher temperatures for the same pair of surfaces.)</p>
<p>See if you can recall the following from high school physics:</p>
<div id="attachment_613" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-613" title="Normal Friction" src="http://engineerography.com/files/2009/07/500px-Friction_alt.svg-300x288.png" alt="Normal Friction" width="300" height="288" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Normal Friction</p></div>
<p>For normal solids, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friction">friction force</a> is strictly dependent on the force that&#8217;s pushing the two surfaces together. For instance, the friction force we encounter when we try to push a big aluminum cube on smooth wooden surface depends on how heavy that box is. Interestingly, and intuitively, a smaller cube with the same weight will have the same friction force. This is important to keep in mind!</p>
<p>What makes our fingers so interesting and this new research so surprising is that our fingerprints don&#8217;t act like normal solids. According to <a href="http://www.livescience.com/animals/090612-fingerprint-friction.html">LiveScience</a>, &#8220;<span style="border-collapse: collapse; ">the finger was not behaving like a normal solid; it was behaving like rubber. With rubber, friction is proportional to the contact area between two surfaces, not how hard they press together.&#8221; This makes things very interesting to consider. The harder we push or the tighter we grip something with our fingers, we are just increasing the surface area of contact. (In fact, because of the ridges on our fingers, there is naturally less contact area than if our fingers were perfectly smooth. So when press hard on something, we are increasing the contact area.) The fact that we increase the normal force (or the squeezing force) with our fingers isn&#8217;t directly related to the friction force as it is with normal solids (see above).</span></p>
<p><span style="border-collapse: collapse; ">If fingerprints don&#8217;t help with grip and actually make it worse, why do we have them? <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Science/story?id=7827875&amp;page=1">ABC News</a> summaries the possibilities: </span></p>
<blockquote>
<p style="margin-top: 10px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 0px; padding: 0px;">A French team of researchers working with a mechanical hand loaded with tactile sensors found that fingerprint-like ridges improved the hand&#8217;s tactile sensitivity.</p>
<p style="margin-top: 10px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 0px; padding: 0px;">Another possibility is that fingerprints help wick water off of our hands, improving grip on wet surfaces, Ennos says. Or alternatively, they might work in coordination with soft finger and foot pads to help skin fit more snugly to abrasive surfaces, reducing shear stress. &#8220;We very rarely get blisters on the soles of our feet or our fingertips,&#8221; he [Ennos] says.</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="margin-top: 10px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 0px; padding: 0px;">(Image from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friction">Wikipedia</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://engineerography.com/2009/07/friction-at-the-tip-of-the-finger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

