<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Engineerography Blog &#187; Hulu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://engineerography.com/tag/hulu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://engineerography.com</link>
	<description>Studying and writing about everyday engineering, since 2009.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:48:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>X-Plane Engineering Competition</title>
		<link>http://engineerography.com/2009/08/x-plane-engineering-competition/</link>
		<comments>http://engineerography.com/2009/08/x-plane-engineering-competition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin C.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recommendations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aircraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hulu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engineerography.com/?p=800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I&#8217;d like to start with another Hulu video recommendation.
This time, it&#8217;s a oldie-but-goodie about the final-round competition between Boeing and Lockheed Martin. The stringent requirements of the next-generation U.S. military strike fighter were well-characterized by Lockheed Martin&#8217;s X-35, which beat out Boeing&#8217;s X-32. After winning the government contract, the X-35 was renamed F-35.
The F-35 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I&#8217;d like to start with another Hulu video recommendation.</p>
<p>This time, it&#8217;s a oldie-but-goodie about the final-round competition between Boeing and Lockheed Martin. The stringent requirements of the next-generation U.S. military strike fighter were well-characterized by Lockheed Martin&#8217;s X-35, which beat out Boeing&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_X-32">X-32</a>. After winning the government contract, the X-35 was renamed <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-35_Lightning_II">F-35</a>.</p>
<p>The F-35 is a&#8221;fifth-generation, single-seat, single-engine, stealth-capable military strike fighter, a multirole aircraft that can perform close air support, tactical bombing, and air defense missions. The F-35 has three different models; one is the conventional takeoff and landing variant, the second is short takeoff and vertical-landing variant, and the third is a carrier-based variant.&#8221; (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-35_Lightning_II">Wikipedia</a>) The F-35 Lightning II is expected to be fully introduced in 2016.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="512" height="296" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.hulu.com/embed/yrCfQSOETR_GM9wswtXc8A" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="512" height="296" src="http://www.hulu.com/embed/yrCfQSOETR_GM9wswtXc8A" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Not only is the F-35 an awesome feat of engineering, which is interesting to learn about in its own right, I&#8217;d like to bring your attention to the overall <a href="http://engineerography.com/2009/01/the-engineering-design-process/">design process</a> of getting the job done. All engineering students who have lived through such a challenging and demanding experience will surely enjoy watching how Boeing&#8217;s team and Lockheed Martin&#8217;s team fought it out with design decisions and prototype manufacturing to eventual failure or success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://engineerography.com/2009/08/x-plane-engineering-competition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York City Bridges</title>
		<link>http://engineerography.com/2009/07/new-york-city-bridges/</link>
		<comments>http://engineerography.com/2009/07/new-york-city-bridges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin C.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recommendations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bridges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engineerography.com/?p=638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being a (slightly) proud New York City native, I couldn&#8217;t pass up this opportunity to share video that I watched this past Independence Day weekend. It&#8217;s an episode of the show &#8220;Man Made&#8221; titled Bridges of NYC (via Hulu). In its history, New York City has held consecutive world records for the longest bridge, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_644" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 680px"><img class="size-full wp-image-644 " title="Brooklyn Bridge Gothic Arches" src="http://engineerography.com/files/2009/07/2633089524_9be4cd9504_b1.jpg" alt="Brooklyn Bridge Gothic Arches" width="670" height="442" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Brooklyn Bridge Gothic Arches</p></div>
<p>Being a (slightly) proud New York City native, I couldn&#8217;t pass up this opportunity to share video that I watched this past Independence Day weekend. It&#8217;s an episode of the show &#8220;Man Made&#8221; titled <a href="http://www.hulu.com/watch/28436/man-made-bridges-of-nyc?c=News-and-Information#s-p1-so-i0">Bridges of NYC</a> (via Hulu). In its history, New York City has held consecutive world records for the longest bridge, and not just once too. From the times of New Amsterdam, we had the Brooklyn Bridge, which was the longest bridge of its time, followed by the Williamsburg Bridge, which was the longest of <em>its</em> time, to the Queensboro Bridge, to the George Washington Bridge, etc. Each has its specialty and each has its interesting history.</p>
<p>If you like bridges or if you live in New York City, this is a must see. Watch the video <a href="http://www.hulu.com/watch/28436/man-made-bridges-of-nyc?c=News-and-Information#s-p1-so-i0" target="_blank">here on Hulu</a>, or below. (It&#8217;s about 45 minutes long.)</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="512" height="296" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.hulu.com/embed/4SdFKgT7o_8KomAyVQFcyQ" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="512" height="296" src="http://www.hulu.com/embed/4SdFKgT7o_8KomAyVQFcyQ" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>My personal favorite is the original one, the Brooklyn Bridge. The photo above was taken from my <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/usumbs/sets/72157605951253953/">personal collection</a>. The bridge has far more character than any of the others, I&#8217;d say. Which one do you like most, in terms of looks, or design, or whatever? Leave a note in the comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://engineerography.com/2009/07/new-york-city-bridges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
