<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Engineerography Blog &#187; Runway</title>
	<atom:link href="http://engineerography.com/tag/runway/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://engineerography.com</link>
	<description>Studying and writing about everyday engineering, since 2009.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 15:26:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Airport Runway Design (Part 2)</title>
		<link>http://engineerography.com/2009/06/airport-runway-design-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://engineerography.com/2009/06/airport-runway-design-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin C.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In-Depth Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airplane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Runway]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engineerography.com/?p=481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a modest part 2 of Airport Runway Design from last week. Last time, I explained a little about the nomenclature of runways, from the 10-degree approximated angles in the direction they are pointed. As review, the &#8220;09&#8243; marker below indicates 90 degrees (which we know as pointing to the right). Note that the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a modest part 2 of <a href="http://engineerography.com/2009/06/airport-runway-design-part-1/">Airport Runway Design</a> from last week. Last time, I explained a little about the nomenclature of runways, from the 10-degree approximated angles in the direction they are pointed. As review, the &#8220;09&#8243; marker below indicates 90 degrees (which we know as pointing to the right). Note that the names of these runways are pronounced as &#8220;Runway Zero Nine,&#8221; with each digit read separately for clarity.</p>
<div id="attachment_529" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 580px"><img class="size-large wp-image-529" title="Runway Design Markings" src="http://engineerography.com/files/2009/06/runwaydesign-570x156.png" alt="Runway Design Markings" width="570" height="156" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Runway Design Markings</p></div>
<p>In terms of design consideration, I had quoted from <a href="http://science.howstuffworks.com/airport4.htm">HowStuffWorks</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Main runways are usually oriented to line up with the prevailing wind patterns so that airplanes can take-off into the wind and land with it. Local and ground air traffic controllers determine which runways are used for take-off and which for landing, taking into account weather, wind and air-traffic conditions. In some airports, main runways cross each other, so the controllers have to pay even closer attention.</p></blockquote>
<p>Let&#8217;s take second look at this &#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Runway Sections</strong></p>
<div id="attachment_530" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 580px"><img class="size-large wp-image-530" title="Runway Sections" src="http://engineerography.com/files/2009/06/runwaysections-570x73.png" alt="Runway Sections" width="570" height="73" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Runway Sections</p></div>
<p>The runway is technically the surface between the thresholds (see the above image). On either side of the runway are sections called <strong>blast pads</strong>, which function as emergency space to slowly stop planes that overrun the runway on a bad landing on an aborted take-off. They are also used to absorb the initial jet blast from large planes during take-off. Blast pads are marked with yellow chevrons and typically aren&#8217;t as strong as actual runways. This section isn&#8217;t used (for taxiing, take-off, or landing) except in an emergency.</p>
<p>In between the blast pad and the runway is the <strong>displaced threshold</strong> section which can be used for taxiing, take-off and landing rollouts, only. They cannot be used for the touchdown part of landings.</p>
<p><strong>Runway Configurations</strong></p>
<p>There are four basic configurations for runways. Of course, there are others, but those are just variations of the four. The <strong>single runway</strong> is the simplest of the four. Then we get the <strong>parallel runway</strong> of which there are four sub-types. Next there is the <strong>open-V runway</strong>, which have two sub-types. Finally, the most complex configuration is the <strong>intersecting runway</strong>, with three sub-types.</p>
<p>In the end, though, reasons for choosing one configuration over another is all about the prevailing winds, noise pollution, and local restrictions, among other. See the table below that summaries the different types:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-539" title="Runway Configurations" src="http://engineerography.com/files/2009/06/runways2.png" alt="Runway Configurations" width="570" height="1112" /></p>
<p>Runway Design Markings and Runway Sections images are taken from <a href="http://virtualskies.arc.nasa.gov/design/tutorial/tutorial5.html">here</a>.</p>
<p>Check out these links for much more information on these runways:<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runway"><br />
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runway</a><a href="http://virtualskies.arc.nasa.gov/design/tutorial/tutorial1.html"></p>
<p>http://virtualskies.arc.nasa.gov/design/tutorial/tutorial1.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://engineerography.com/2009/06/airport-runway-design-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Airport Runway Design (Part 1)</title>
		<link>http://engineerography.com/2009/06/airport-runway-design-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://engineerography.com/2009/06/airport-runway-design-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 13:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin C.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In-Depth Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airplane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Runway]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engineerography.com/?p=476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Understanding airport runway design is probably unnecessary if you aren&#8217;t in the business or industry of caring about it, but it is actually pretty cool stuff. (It&#8217;s not likely that you&#8217;ll be running around on the tarmac anyway.) What&#8217;s a runway for? It is for airplanes to take off and land. That one&#8217;s easy. But [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Understanding airport runway design is probably unnecessary if you aren&#8217;t in the business or industry of caring about it, but it is actually pretty cool stuff. (It&#8217;s not likely that you&#8217;ll be running around on the tarmac anyway.)</p>
<p>What&#8217;s a runway for? It is for airplanes to take off and land. That one&#8217;s easy. But what are they made of, and how do people know how to position them in an airport? Considering the frequency of take-offs and landings at any major airport, it&#8217;s important to know that people have thought of these things (for the most part) to keep everything flowing smoothly and safely.</p>
<div id="attachment_509" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 230px"><img class="size-full wp-image-509" title="Airport Runway" src="http://engineerography.com/files/2009/06/runway.jpg" alt="Airport runways are carefully designed to make air travel as efficient and robust as possible." width="220" height="165" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Airport runways are carefully designed to make air travel as efficient and robust as possible.</p></div>
<p><strong>Some Specifications</strong></p>
<p>As for the specifications of an average runway, they can run from anywhere between 6000 feet to 10,000 feet (about two miles) long. Most of them are able to accomodate landings of aircraft that are less than 200,000 pounds, but others can take much more weight. A typical Boeing 747-400 is about 800,000 pounds upon take-off, but it can only land safely if it is less than about 700,000 pounds. (This explains why we sometimes hear of airplanes circling an airport for some time before landing; it needs to burn up fuel to lose weight in order to land.) Similar situations are apparent in all aircraft (albeit not necessarily those particular weights). And of course, under no circumstance can the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_airliners_by_Maximum_Takeoff_Weight">maximum landing weight</a> be higher than the maximum take-off weight.</p>
<p>As for the runway length, we would need to consider the density of the air. Remember that, at higher altitudes, the density of air is less, which decreases the amount of lift and thrust. Just know that an aircraft landing at a higher altitude would require a longer runway. And along the same lines of density, fluids (like air) are less dense at warmer temperatures. As such, an aircraft will require a longer runway in hotter or more humid conditions than in cooler, dryer ones.</p>
<p><strong>Design Considerations</strong></p>
<p>Main runways are usually oriented so that during take-offs and landings, the airplane is flying into the wind. Flying into the wind upon take off is a good thing because it allows for more airflow across the wings (see last week&#8217;s post on lift: &#8220;<a title="Lift Force From Aircraft Wings" href="http://engineerography.com/2009/05/lift-force-from-aircraft-wings/">Lift Force From Aircraft Wings</a>&#8220;) while using less runway length. But once we&#8217;re in the air, however, going against the wind can massively reduce our efficiency and increase our flight time. We&#8217;ll want to avoid this as best we can, but there isn&#8217;t a way to control wind speed in nature just yet.</p>
<p>From <a href="http://science.howstuffworks.com/airport4.htm">HowStuffWorks</a>: &#8220;Main runways are usually oriented to line up with the prevailing wind patterns so that airplanes can take-off into the wind and land with it. Local and ground air traffic controllers determine which runways are used for take-off and which for landing, taking into account weather, wind and air-traffic conditions. In some airports, main runways cross each other, so the controllers have to pay even closer attention.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Markings</strong></p>
<p>Each runway is labeled with seemingly random combination of alphanumerics. But of course, nothing in engineering is random (hopefully). Following navigation and surveying convention, picture a north-south-west-east compass with angles broken down from 0 to 360 degrees. In this configuration, 0 and 360 are pointed north (not east, as we are wont to expect!). So, 90 degrees points east, 180 points south, and 270 points west.</p>
<p>At the end of each runway is a number that indicates the angle that the runway points to, rounded to the nearest 10-degrees, and then divided by 10. So, if an airplane were to land by flying west, the &#8220;right&#8221; end of that runway would show a big 27. The &#8220;left&#8221; would show the opposite, which would be a 9.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t that cool!?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s all for now. We&#8217;ll pick up on this next time, with runway configurations.</p>
<p>(Image from NASA.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://engineerography.com/2009/06/airport-runway-design-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

